Uefa president boycotts World Cup final over Fifa disputes

By Joel Kavanagh — 20 July 2026 — 3 min read

Uefa president Aleksander Ceferin did not attend the World Cup final, citing a protest against Fifa’s decisions. This boycott follows a series of disagreements between European football’s governing body and the global federation.

Ceferin’s absence from the final in New Jersey was reportedly influenced by several issues concerning Fifa’s management of the tournament. While he was present for the opening match in Mexico City, his decision to skip the final underscores the strained relationship between the two organisations.

Discontent over disciplinary decisions and rule changes

A significant factor in Ceferin’s protest was Fifa’s handling of United States striker Folarin Balogun. Balogun avoided a suspension after an intervention from US President Donald Trump, a decision Uefa publicly criticised as “unprecedented, incomprehensible and unjustifiable.” Uefa stated that when the certainty of rules is compromised, the integrity of the game and the credibility of a competition are undermined.

This incident, where a one-match ban for Balogun was suspended, was described by Uefa as having “crossed a red line.” The involvement of President Trump in requesting a “review” of Balogun’s red card raised questions regarding political influence in Fifa’s decision-making processes.

Uefa has also expressed strong opposition to various changes championed by Fifa president Gianni Infantino. These include the introduction of half-time shows, which extended the usual 15-minute break to over 27 minutes. Performers such as Madonna, BTS, Shakira, and Justin Bieber participated in these events. Uefa has confirmed that such extended half-time shows will not be adopted in the Champions League or the European Championship.

Another point of contention is the possibility of a 64-team World Cup, a concept Infantino appeared to entertain during the tournament, which Uefa strongly opposes.

Other areas of disagreement

The treatment of referee Omar Artan also highlighted the friction. After Artan was denied entry to the US before the tournament, Uefa invited the Somali official to officiate the Super Cup match.

Ticket pricing for the World Cup has also been a source of controversy for Uefa. In contrast, Uefa plans to largely freeze ticket prices for Euro 2028, making tickets more accessible. Uefa has also pledged not to implement dynamic pricing for its tournaments.

Furthermore, Uefa has instructed its VAR officials not to consider diving under the new mistaken identity protocol, a practice Fifa adopted during the World Cup. This protocol led to Switzerland striker Breel Embolo being sent off in a quarter-final match against Argentina.

Uefa competitions will also not issue red cards to players who cover their mouths during confrontations with opponents. This issue gained prominence when Benfica winger Gianluca Prestianni was accused of racist abuse during a Champions League game, leading to a provisional ban and a subsequent six-match ban for homophobic conduct after a Uefa investigation. The rule change for a red card in such instances was an initiative of Infantino, intended to have a deterrent effect at the World Cup. Paraguay’s Miguel Almiron was the first player to receive a red card under this rule in a World Cup group stage match against Turkey, followed by Arsenal defender Piero Hincapie in Ecuador’s last-16 exit to co-hosts Mexico.

The strained relationship between the two football bodies continues to be evident through these differing stances on governance, disciplinary actions, and rule interpretations.

Uefa’s decision to invite Omar Artan to officiate the Super Cup underscores its independent stance.

Read Also

• Football legend Kevin Keegan dies aged 75
• Newcastle legend Kevin Keegan dies aged 75
• World Cup 2026: A retrospective
• Tyneside reflects on Kevin Keegan's managerial tenures

Source: bbc.com